Jump to content

Ways of Seeing

From Slow Like Wiki
Revision as of 14:12, 17 October 2026 by Robert.adlington (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== 1. Seeing, Images, and Mystification == * Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognizes before it can speak. * It is seeing which establishes our place in the surrounding world; we explain that world with words, but words can never undo the fact that we are surrounded by it. The relation between what we see and what we know if never settled. * We never look at just one thing; we are always looking at the relation between things and ourselves. Our vision is...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

1. Seeing, Images, and Mystification

  • Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognizes before it can speak.
  • It is seeing which establishes our place in the surrounding world; we explain that world with words, but words can never undo the fact that we are surrounded by it. The relation between what we see and what we know if never settled.
  • We never look at just one thing; we are always looking at the relation between things and ourselves. Our vision is continually active, continually moving, continually holding things in a circle around itself, constituting what is present to us as we are.
  • Soon after we can see, we are aware that we can also be seen. The eye of the other combines with our own eye to make it fully credible that we are part of the visible world.
  • In the sense in which we use the word in this book, all images are man-made.
  • An image is a sight which has been recreated or reproduced. It is an appearance, or a set of appearances, which has been detached from the place and time in which it first made its appearance and preserved - for a few moments or a few centuries. Every image embodies a way of seeing.
  • Every drawing or painting that used perspective proposed to the spectator that he was the unique centre of the world. The camera - and more particularly the move camera - demonstrated that there was no centre.

3. Women, Objects, Nakedness, and Nudity

  • A woman must continually watch herself. She is almost continually accompanied by her own image of herself. Whilst she is walking across a room or whilst she is weeping at the death of her father, she can scarcely avoid envisaging herself walking or weeping. From earliest childhood she has been taught and persuaded to survey herself continually.
  • And so she comes to consider the surveyor and the surveyed within her as the two constituent yet always distinct elements of her identity as a woman.
  • She has to survey everything she is and everything she does because how she appears to others, and ultimately how she appears to men, is of crucial importance for what is normally thought of as the success of her life. Her own sense of being in herself is supplanted by a sense of being appreciated. as herself by another.
  • One might simplify this by saying: men act and women appear. Men look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at. This determines not only most relations between men and women but also the relation of women to themselves. The surveyor of woman in herself is male. the surveyed female. Thus she turns herself into an object - and most particularly an object of vision: a sight.
  • To be naked is to be oneself.
  • To be nude is to be seen naked by others and yet not recognized for oneself. A naked body has to be seen as an object in order to becomes a nude. (The sight of it as an object stimulates the use of it as an object.) Nakedness reveals itself. Nudity is placed on display.
  • To be naked is to be without disguise.
  • To be on display is to have the surface of one's own skin, the hairs of one's own body, turned into a disguise which, in that situation, can never be discarded. The nude is condemned to never being naked. Nudity is a form of dress.
  • In lived sexual experience nakedness is a process rather than a state. If one moment of that process is isolated, its image will seem banal and it banality, instead of serving as a bridge between two intense imaginative states, will be chilling.

5. Oil Painting (1500-1900) - Images as Possession

  • It is usually said that the oil painting in its frame is like an imaginary window open on to the world. This is roughly the tradition's own image of itself.
  • If one studies the culture of the European oil painting as a whole, and if one leaves aside its own claims for itself, its model is not so much a framed window open on to the world as a safe let into the wall, a safe in which the visible has been deposited.

7. Publicity (1900-Present - Images as Aspiration

  • In the cities in which we live, all of us see hundreds of publicity images everyday of our lives. No other kind of image confronts us so frequently.
  • In no other form of society in history has there been such a concentration of images, such a density of visual messages.
  • One may remember or forget these messages but briefly one takes them in, and for a moment they stimulate the imagination by way of either memory or expectation. The publicity image belongs to the moment.
  • We accept the total system of publicity images as we accept an element of climate.
  • Glamour - The state of being envied. And publicity is the process of manufacturing glamour.
  • Publicity is never a celebration of a pleasure-in-itself. Publicity is always about the future buyer. It offers him an image of himself made glamorous by the product or opportunity it is trying to sell. The image then makes him envious of himself as he might be. Yet what makes this self-which-he-might-be enviable? The envy of others. Publicity is about social relations, not objects. Its promise is not of pleasure, but of happiness: happiness as judged from the outside by others. The happiness of being envied is glamour.
  • The absent, unfocused look of so many glamour images. The look out over the looks of envy which sustain them.
  • The publicity image steals the consumers love of herself as she is, and offers it back to her for the price of the product.
  • Does the language of publicity have anything in common with that of oil painting which, until the invention of the camera, dominated the European way of seeing during four centuries?
  • Publicity relies to a very large extent on the language of oil painting. It speaks in the same voice about the same things.
  • Publicity is the culture of the consumer society. It propagates through images that society's belief in itself. There are several reasons why these images use the language of oil painting:
    • Oil painting, before it was anything else, was a celebration of private property. As an art-form it derived from the principle that you are what you have.
    • It is a mistake to think of publicity supplanting the visual art of post-Ranaissance Europe; it is the last moribund form of that art.